In-House vs. Third-Party Collections: The Decision is Yours

Publisher: Shaw Systems Associates, LLC

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

In-House vs. Third-Party Collections: The Decision is Yours has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.

Register to access this content

By accessing content on the Insurance & Technology Online Buyer's Guide you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

In-House vs. Third-Party Collections: The Decision is Yours

All lenders are faced with the decision of how to collect on delinquent borrowers: collect in-house or pay a third party to collect on your behalf. The fact that there is a decision to make implies that the answer isn’t the same for everyone. There are benefits and risks on both sides.

Similar content you might be interested in

CI3: How Does Your Insurance Business Respond to Natural Disasters?

Publisher: Cloverleaf Analytics

CI3: How Does Your Insurance Business Respond to Natural Disasters?

December 2024 Cloverleaf Insurance Insights edition.

Download Content »

Transforming Agency business with a new AMS: Approach, Execution, Risks and Mitigation

Publisher: Nest Innovative Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Transforming Agency business with a new AMS: Approach, Execution, Risks and Mitigation

Digital transformation with new agency management systems is difficult but required at times. Studies and researches have reported that only about one third of such digital transformations deliver the expected results. The key success factors depend upon the path that the Agency chooses, how that approach is executed in practice, and how the risks around that are mitigated. Download to learn more.

Download Content »

Get One Step Closer to Zero Defect Loans eBook

Publisher: Integrated Document Technologies, Inc. (IDT)

Get One Step Closer to Zero Defect Loans eBook

The concept of zero-defects is challenging to achieve, and even Fannie Mae does not evaluate lenders by a zero-defect-rate standard. Instead, Fannie Mae expects lenders to set defect rate targets as reasonably low as possible based on formal cost-benefit analysis and demonstrate to Fannie Mae how they are managing loan quality to meet their established target. But with the rise of technology companies helping mortgage originators, lenders can get one step closer to that zero-defect loan without compromising time or profits. Learn more by clicking on link below.

Download Content »